News & Publications

Post Election: US Tariff Risks

A major topic of the 2024 Trump campaign was centered around the use of trade policy global diplomacy and economic protection strategies. With his election win, we can anticipate significant shifts in global trade action, including policies aimed at reshaping supply chains and trade practices. Here are some key takeaways on what your import/export operations can expect in 2025 and beyond.

Key Takeaways:

  • Short-Term Economic Optimism vs. Long-Term Uncertainty: Trump's promises of tax cuts, tariff hikes, and stricter immigration policies have fueled optimism in markets, with rising stock prices, Treasury yields, and a stronger dollar. However, there is considerable uncertainty about whether these policies will have sustainable, long-term positive effects on the economy.
  • Tariffs and Global Trade Impact: The reintroduction of tariffs, particularly on imports from China, is expected to create significant challenges for U.S. businesses and global supply chains. This includes a potential escalation of tariffs to 60% on Chinese goods and 10-20% on imports from other countries. The resulting trade tensions could disrupt global trade and affect European businesses, prompting them to consider diversifying supply chains.
  • Geopolitical and U.S.-Asia Relations Risks: Trump's policies could escalate tensions between the U.S. and Asia, particularly China and Taiwan. Taiwan's critical role in global semiconductor supply chains could exacerbate risks. Additionally, potential tariffs on Mexican goods could alter regional trade dynamics, making Mexico a more attractive alternative to China for production.
  • Immigration Policy and Talent Flow Challenges: Tighter U.S. immigration policies under Trump, especially on skilled worker visas like H1B, could restrict access to tech talent. This might lead companies to shift operations or talent sourcing to countries like Canada or Mexico, impacting global labor markets and business operations in the U.S.
  • Supply Chain Restructuring and Strategic Adaptation: Businesses will likely need to adapt to higher tariffs by shifting sourcing strategies. This includes stockpiling goods before tariffs, shifting production to non-tariffed countries, or reshoring operations to reduce tariff exposure. However, these strategies come with operational challenges and costs, particularly for businesses with complex global supply chains.

As 2025 investment outlooks begin to take shape, investors face a daunting challenge in light of the unexpected scope of Donald Trump’s 2024 electoral victory. His promises of corporate tax cuts, tariff hikes, and tighter immigration policies have already sent markets into a whirlwind of optimism, with rising stock prices, Treasury yields, and a stronger dollar. However, the long-term sustainability of these "Trump trades" remains highly uncertain as businesses, investors, and European corporates brace for the potential impacts of his policy shifts on global trade, supply chains, and geopolitical risks.

Navigating the Return of Import Tariffs Under President-Elect Donald Trump
With the return to office of President-elect Donald Trump, U.S. companies face the looming possibility of renewed import tariffs, particularly from mainland China. These tariffs may also extend more broadly to other countries, triggering responses in kind from global trading partners. As a result, businesses must once again prepare to manage the financial and operational challenges posed by tariffs.

What Are Tariffs?
Tariffs, also known as customs duties, are a form of indirect tax imposed on imported goods. The amount of duty charged on any given import depends on its classification under the "Harmonized System" (HS), a global nomenclature for goods maintained by the World Customs Organization (WCO). The HS divides goods into 21 sections, 97 chapters, and over 5,000 subheadings, which are regularly updated.
In the U.S., tariffs are governed by the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), which outlines over 17,000 tariff codes, each associated with a specific duty rate. These duties are generally assessed ad valorem, meaning as a percentage of the product’s declared value, though they can also be based on units like weight or volume. Importantly, navigating the HTSUS to determine the “landed cost” of goods—critical for business decisions—requires expertise, as errors can result in significant financial consequences, particularly as tariffs are expected to increase under President Trump’s proposals.

Types of U.S. Tariffs
Tariffs in the U.S. come in several forms:

  • Normal Trade Relations (NTR) Duties: These are the most common tariffs, applied to goods from countries with which the U.S. maintains trade relations. They can only be imposed through legislation by Congress, and the U.S. is bound by agreements made as part of its membership in the World Trade Organization (WTO).
  • Antidumping and Countervailing Duties: These specialized tariffs address unfair trade practices, such as foreign price discrimination (dumping) or foreign government subsidies. They are applied after investigations by U.S. agencies and are not subject to changes by Congress or the President.
  • Section 301 Tariffs: These tariffs are a tool for addressing trade practices deemed to violate international agreements, such as China’s forced technology transfers and intellectual property theft. Section 301 tariffs were a hallmark of the Trump Administration’s trade policy, leading to significant tariffs on Chinese goods.
  • Section 232 Tariffs: Imposed on goods deemed a threat to U.S. national security, such as steel and aluminum. These tariffs can be imposed unilaterally by the President and are in addition to other duties. The Trump administration also launched investigations into additional sectors, such as automobiles and uranium, although not all led to tariff impositions.
  • Section 201 “Safeguard” Tariffs: These tariffs are applied to imported goods that threaten to harm U.S. industries. Section 201 investigations often target specific industries based on petitions from domestic producers or trade groups, and the tariffs are imposed through Presidential Proclamation.

The Trump Trade: A Short-Term Boost?
Markets have responded positively to the anticipation of Trump's policies, with many betting on the economic benefits of his proposed corporate tax cuts and tariff hikes. Since October, the dollar index has surged by 5%, 30-year bond yields have risen by 0.5%, and the S&P 500 has climbed 3%. Bitcoin has also seen an uptick, fueled by the expectation that Trump may support cryptocurrency. However, these immediate gains face significant uncertainty: which of Trump's policies will materialize, and how will they impact the broader economy? Investors must navigate this ambiguity and position themselves accordingly for what might be an unpredictable 2025.

Economic and Trade Risks: Europe's Vulnerability
For European businesses, the 2024 U.S. election outcome signals the potential for dramatic shifts in U.S. trade policies. Key areas of concern include the reintroduction of higher tariffs, potential changes to energy policies, and the impact on U.S.-Asia relations. One of the most immediate and impactful changes could be the imposition of up to 60% tariffs on Chinese imports. This would be a sharp escalation from the 7.5%-25% tariffs levied during Trump’s first term, targeting goods from China, which is now grappling with a severe property market crisis, high debt, and weak domestic demand. These new tariffs could exacerbate China’s economic challenges, further disrupting global supply chains, and particularly affecting European businesses reliant on Chinese manufacturing and exports.

Global Tariff Increase and Shift in Production
Beyond China, Trump is expected to implement a 10-20% tariff on imports from other countries, increasing the overall tariff burden on global trade. As these tariffs rise, businesses will need to adapt by diversifying their supply chains to mitigate risks. Southeast Asia and Mexico are emerging as attractive alternatives due to lower tariffs and proximity to the U.S. This trend offers companies the opportunity to reduce exposure to escalating U.S. trade barriers, but it also means more supply chain restructuring and potential costs for businesses as they adjust.

Geopolitical Risks and U.S.-Asia Relations
Trump's policies could also significantly impact U.S.-Asia relations. The potential for escalating tensions between China and Taiwan is a major concern. Taiwan plays a critical role in global supply chains, particularly in electronics and semiconductors. Disruptions in these critical sectors would have far-reaching consequences for global businesses, including European firms.

Additionally, Trump has threatened to impose steep tariffs on Mexican goods, particularly in the automotive sector, unless Mexico curbs the flow of drugs and criminals into the U.S. While the likelihood of this happening remains uncertain, Mexico could still benefit from the shift away from China as companies look to relocate production to avoid tariffs. This could alter trade dynamics in the region, with Mexico becoming an increasingly attractive manufacturing hub.

U.S. Immigration Policies and Global Talent Flows
Under Trump, U.S. immigration policies, especially those concerning skilled workers, are expected to tighten. Restrictions on H1B, L1, and O1 visas could limit companies' access to international talent, particularly in tech sectors. As a result, many companies may look to Canada or Mexico as alternatives for tech talent, further driving the trend of opening regional offices outside the U.S. This shift could have implications for global labor markets, as businesses diversify their talent pools away from the U.S.

Global Supply Chain and Economic Impact
The imposition of higher tariffs under Trump's administration would lead to increased costs for U.S. importers and consumers, potentially disrupting global supply chains. Trump's economic strategy of reducing trade deficits and protecting domestic industries could create friction with trading partners, straining businesses worldwide. Companies will need to diversify suppliers and production locations to minimize the impact of rising costs, particularly as geopolitical tensions and tariff increases create uncertainty.

Impact on China's Fragile Economy
China’s economy is now in a much weaker position than it was during Trump’s first term, grappling with a property market crisis, high debt levels, and weak domestic demand. Its ability to absorb the impact of tariffs is severely constrained, and deflationary pressures could worsen if external demand weakens further. China’s industrial overcapacity, especially in manufacturing, is contributing to factory gate deflation, making it difficult for Chinese companies to remain competitive in the face of higher U.S. tariffs.

Moreover, China’s limited room for currency depreciation could lead to potential capital outflows and economic instability, further complicating its ability to counteract the effects of tariffs. While China may seek to boost exports in sectors such as electric vehicles and batteries, these efforts are unlikely to offset the broader economic slowdown or reverse the impact of U.S. tariffs.

Lobbying for Exemptions: Fighting Tariffs at the Source
One immediate strategy for businesses is to lobby the U.S. government for tariff exemptions, or even for the removal of certain duties altogether. These efforts can take various forms, including exemption requests or direct lobbying. However, lobbying effectiveness can vary widely, and the political context often influences the outcome. Efforts to lobby before tariffs are enacted may be more successful in preventing duties, while post-tariff lobbying can be trickier, as it may involve political messaging.

Exemptions may be granted on specific products, temporarily reducing the impact of tariffs. Companies that succeed in obtaining such exemptions can gain a competitive edge, though the political visibility associated with lobbying efforts may pose risks. For instance, during the Section 301 duties exemption process of 2019, one company achieved a success rate of 62.5% in securing tariff exemptions—far above the industry average—due to close ties between the company’s leadership and the Trump administration.

Financial Strategies: Managing Immediate Impacts
In the short term, companies often focus on mitigating the immediate financial impact of tariffs. Several financial strategies are available, each with its own trade-offs.
One option is to raise the prices of products to offset the increased costs of tariffs. However, this approach can be challenging in competitive industries where price hikes may lead to a loss of market share. Additionally, raising prices can attract political scrutiny, particularly if it exacerbates inflation.
Another potential strategy is to renegotiate contracts with suppliers to lower the cost of raw materials, potentially absorbing the tariff impact. While this may be ideal, renegotiating contracts can take time and may not always be feasible depending on the supply chain dynamics.
Alternatively, businesses can opt to absorb the additional costs by lowering profit margins. This might be a quick fix for high-margin businesses, but firms operating on lower margins may struggle with this approach. Public companies, in particular, may face pressure from shareholders regarding profitability, making this option less attractive for them.

Adjusting Sourcing Strategies: Long-Term Adaptations
Over the long term, businesses can modify their sourcing strategies to avoid or mitigate the impact of tariffs. There are three primary approaches for adapting sourcing decisions:

  • Stockpiling Goods: Companies can accelerate imports to stockpile goods before tariffs are imposed, ensuring a buffer against future price hikes. This strategy was observed in late 2024, as businesses rushed to import goods ahead of potential strikes and tariff increases. However, maintaining high inventory levels may become unsustainable due to the associated costs, particularly in the context of higher interest rates during tariff periods.
  • Shifting Sourcing Locations: Firms may look to shift sourcing to countries unaffected by the tariffs. This can be a solution for tariffs targeting specific products or regions, especially if the new country has favorable trade agreements with the U.S. However, this strategy can lead to higher costs and complications, such as longer shipping times or less reliable suppliers. For example, U.S. imports from mainland China dropped significantly after the previous round of tariffs, with Chinese imports falling from 21.6% of all U.S. imports in 2017 to just 13.5% by mid-2024.
  • Partial Reshoring: Another strategy is to import components instead of finished goods and assemble them domestically. This can reduce the tariff burden by avoiding duties on finished products while still leveraging lower-cost production in other countries. However, this strategy requires significant operational adjustments and may not be feasible for all businesses, particularly those with complex supply chains or specialized products.

Conclusion: Preparing for a Volatile Economic Environment
The shift in U.S. policies under President Trump presents both risks and opportunities for global markets, particularly for European businesses. The imposition of tariffs on Chinese goods, rising trade tensions, and geopolitical uncertainties signal a volatile economic landscape. Companies will need to adapt by diversifying their supply chains, exploring new production hubs, and preparing for potential disruptions in global trade.

Trump’s stance on immigration, trade, and foreign policy will continue to shape the global economic landscape. European corporates must stay agile, ready to respond to changes in U.S. policy, including potential shifts in U.S.-Asia relations and trade barriers. With China facing its most vulnerable economic position in years, ongoing deflationary pressures, and a more volatile geopolitical environment, businesses should focus on risk management and strategic diversification to navigate the coming changes and safeguard their operations. The "Trump trade" may offer short-term gains, but its long-term success depends on how effectively companies can manage the complex challenges ahead.

As we look ahead, companies may face greater challenges in coordinating logistics and trade compliance functions, potentially leading to more risk and costs to the organization. To navigate these complexities, it’s essential to integrate processes and work cross-functionally. Allyn International can leverage our experts and systems to explore options to support your operations with logistics, trade compliance, and tax concerns. Contact us here with your specific questions regarding this topic.

Contributor: Cali Benetis


About Allyn International

Allyn International is dedicated to providing high quality, customer centric services and solutions for the global marketplace. Allyn's core products include transportation management, logistics sourcing, freight forwarding, supply chain consulting, tax management and global trade compliance.  Allyn clients range from small local businesses to Fortune 500 firms. Allyn conducts business in more than 20 languages and has extensive experience in both developed and emerging markets. Highly trained experts are positioned throughout North America, Europe, and Asia. Allyn’s regional headquarters are strategically located in Fort Myers, Florida, U.S.A., Shanghai, P.R. China and Prague, Czech Republic. For more information, visit www.allynintl.com.


Resources:

https://www.reuters.com/markets/there-may-be-no-durable-trump-trade-mike-dolan-2024-11-20/

https://www.fitchratings.com/research/corporate-finance/us-post-election-policy-changes-may-have-implications-for-europes-corporate-sectors-14-11-2024

https://www.cov.com/en/news-and-insights/insights/2024/10/the-impact-of-the-us-elections-on-trade-and-international-supply-chains

https://www.hartfordfunds.com/insights/market-perspectives/global-macro-analysis/election-2024-immigation-tariffs-and-the-us-economy.html

https://www.gibsondunn.com/regulatory-outlook-for-international-trade-following-the-2024-election/

https://www.reuters.com/markets/us/walmart-other-us-companies-raise-concerns-over-proposed-trump-tariffs-2024-11-19/

https://harris-sliwoski.com/chinalawblog/recap-and-replay-of-our-post-election-webinar-the-u-s-election-is-over-whats-next-for-your-international-business/

https://www.spglobal.com/commodityinsights/en/market-insights/latest-news/metals/110624-us-elections-trump-win-tariff-plans-weigh-on-copper-prices

https://www.reuters.com/world/china/why-chinas-economy-is-more-vulnerable-trump-tariffs-this-time-2024-11-06/

 

This website uses a variety of cookies, which you consent to if you continue to use this site. You can read our Privacy Policy for details about how these cookies are used. Manage Cookies